Talk:Szlachta

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Szlachta article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5: 12 months

Other talk page banners

Szlachta was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 27, 2006	Good article nominee	Not listed

Belarus

	Belarus portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelarusWikipedia:WikiProject BelarusTemplate:WikiProject BelarusBelarus
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Poland High‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ukraine High‑importance

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lithuania High‑importance

	Lithuania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Mid‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 13 April 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved to Polish nobility. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Genealogia ???

The following sentence is incomprehensible:

In the year 1244, Bolesław, Duke of Masovia, identified members of the knights' clan as members of a genealogia:

what is 'genealogia
what is the knights' clan
what is "identified.

And the rest of the section is a haphazard mix of terminologies cited from various authors from various centuries.

I looked into this page because the following inept "improvenent" popped up in my watchlist and was about to fix it, but then I noticed that the whole article is a mess. I made a number of quick fixes for issues that caught my unarmed eye during a quick scan, but a more thorough reworking. Major issues: haphazard structure and chaotic use of foreign terminolory, probably borrowed from foreign authors, who used native terms for whatever reason. One example: section "Privileges" used the French term "Levée en masse". If you click it, you will learn nothing useful, not to say it was accompanied with false "explanation". I replaced it with "pospolite ruszenie", which I strongly suspect was meant.

@Piotrus: @Nihil novi: @Merangs: It seems that nobody seriously worked on the article for several years; in the page history I see nobody but wikignomes and occasional vandals. Ruszamy się pospołu do pracy uczciwej, nie? --Altenmann >talk 19:20, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Altenmann: – Hi, thank you for observing this and pinging me. In general, this article, if you can call it as such, requires some serious copy editing and trimming. The amount of nonsense I've read or seen here added by new users or IPs in the past was overwhelming for me. Perhaps it was added in good faith, poorly translated or just outright vandalism/test edits. I suggest that we proceed with deleting any dubious content. What's your take on this? Merangs (talk) 19:34, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For comparison, pl:Szlachta w Polsce is much smaller. A przecież wiemy, że Polak Potrafi :-), so there must be reason. Maybe not everything must be squeezed into one page. For example we have Nobility privileges in Poland which virtually has no overlap with pl:Przywileje szlacheckie. On the other hand, pl:Możnowładztwo is missing in enwiki, while pl:Ziemiaństwo says plenty of Polish point of view, while our Polish landed gentry again, mixes Polish and English concepts. So my global suggestions:

Split per WP:Summary style
Larger poorly written or underrefenced pieces may be moved here, in talk page, for closer inspection and further processing, --Altenmann >talk 20:19, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fine for me. Regarding the nobles' privileges, I would leave about two to three sentences in this article under a heading as a summary and simply add a 'main page' template after the heading acting as a link to the 'Nobility privileges in Poland' page. Merangs (talk) 20:22, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article certainly needs work. Some content might warrant a split. I am happy to help a bit - I'll try to read and c/e this in the near future, but as usual, so much to do, so little time... if anyone wants my input on something specific, or provide a peer review for any level, do say. pl:Możnowładztwo should exist in en, probably; that said, pl wiki article has no references, so it needs a TNT approach, likely. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 23:30, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

re:Możnowładztwo : I didnt look into the text when I was mentioning it, but it seems that możnowładca is just a contemporary word for "magnate", e.g, Polish magnates. Quick loook into books reveals that możnowładzce were even in ancient Greece. :-) - At least that's what 19th century Polish books say. :-) --Altenmann >talk 00:46, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Altenmann According to the wiki articles on pl, magnate is a term used for modern era, whereas możnowładctwo is used for Middle Ages. Would require digging more into sources, and it's always possible Polish (Slavic?) terms are simply different from English. Recently, for example, I've been looking at literature, and it seems Polish concept of a pl:Nowela (I improved that article in pl) is quite different from en:Novella (ru wiki article is meh, but from what I can see it seems to suggest similar conceptualization to Polish, not English; ie. based on characteristics, not lenght). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:04, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I wrote, only sloppily didn't I? In the past możnowładca was a generic term for wealthy influential people. The term "Magnat" in poland acquired a specialized meaning. YOu are right, one has to dig into real sources, because in the internets there is lots of garbage, and when I started looking into plwiki, it suffers from the lack of serious sources. --Altenmann >talk 04:27, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]